Atlassian SOC2 Report
An atlassian soc2 report proves that Atlassian cloud apps follow strict security rules. Engineering teams use this document to pass vendor checks and plan internal controls. Still, a vendor audit report only covers the software provider and its hosting. Your team still owns user roles, data rules, and admin actions inside your systems. What an atlassian soc2 report covers for your audit Independent auditors test a vendor over several months to create a Type II report. They check how the vend
SOC2 Report: the complete guide
Architecture patterns, implementation strategies, and security best practices. Delivered to your inbox.
An atlassian soc2 report proves that Atlassian cloud apps follow strict security rules. Engineering teams use this document to pass vendor checks and plan internal controls.
Still, a vendor audit report only covers the software provider and its hosting. Your team still owns user roles, data rules, and admin actions inside your systems.
What an atlassian soc2 report covers for your audit
Independent auditors test a vendor over several months to create a Type II report. They check how the vendor manages physical servers, code changes, and internal staff access.
Security managers download this document from the vendor trust portal during annual reviews. You then share it with your own auditors to prove vendor risk management.
Every vendor report includes a section on shared rules, called complementary user entity controls. This section lists the exact security tasks that your own team must run.
For example, you must set up single sign-on and remove old users on time. You also have to check admin actions and protect sensitive data inside your tickets.
Your auditors will ask for proof that you follow these shared rules every day. They expect clear logs that align with SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA.
They also want similar evidence for PCI DSS, SOX, and FedRAMP reviews. A vendor PDF alone will never satisfy these strict audit checks for your company.
Why identity setup and access reviews need runtime logs
Most teams start by linking their project tools to an identity provider. This setup controls who can log in and which group roles they get.
Managers also run quarterly checks to remove former staff and trim extra permissions. These static group checks are helpful, but they miss daily work on live systems.
When an engineer fixes a bug in a ticket, they often query a database. They might also run commands on a cloud server to check app status.
SOC2 Report: architecture patterns and best practices
Continue reading? Get the full guide.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A ticket shows the plan, but it does not record the exact database query. Auditors want to see the real commands that ran on your production systems.
Runtime command logs fill this gap by capturing every query and user identity. Each log entry links the exact action to a person and a timestamp.
Teams also need to protect private data during these live support sessions. Response masking rewrites matched fields in results before they reach the screen.
For instance, masking replaces emails, phone numbers, card numbers, and national IDs in query results. Engineers can still fix the issue, and your audit logs stay clean and complete.
How to link ticket approvals with production actions
Many teams track change approvals inside their issue tracking apps. An engineer opens a work item and asks a manager to approve the task.
Once approved, the engineer still needs a safe way to run the production command. If you share static keys, anyone can bypass the ticket check.
You need a clear link between the approved request and the live system session. Auditors check that every production change matches an approved ticket from a peer.
When your runtime logs record both the user and the approval, audits go fast. You can pull one report that shows who asked, who approved, and what ran.
This simple workflow stops unauthorized changes and cuts weeks of manual audit work. Your team spends less time taking screenshots and more time building your core product.
Check database and API queries on the wire
Identity tools, roles, and network rules decide who opens a session. Setup alone cannot check what each query does or mask sensitive values in a response once a session starts. When workflows touch Postgres, MySQL, SQL Server, MongoDB, ClickHouse, Kubernetes APIs, SSH, or internal HTTP APIs, hoop.dev runs beside those services as an open-source proxy, a sidecar for your Postgres or API. It inspects requests coming in and results going back on the wire.
Your login details and client tools stay as they are while hoop.dev guardrails refuse bad deletes or drops before they run. On responses, hoop.dev data masking rewrites matched sensitive values in memory. Furthermore, hoop.dev holds SOC 2 Type II, is MIT licensed, and writes every query and decision to an audit trail that generates evidence for HIPAA, GDPR, and PCI DSS. See the source on GitHub.
Frequently asked questions
How do we get the latest atlassian soc2 report?
You can download the report from the vendor trust center portal. You usually need an account and a signed non-disclosure agreement to read the file.
Does a vendor SOC 2 report make our own setup pass an audit?
No, the report only covers the vendor and its own cloud hosting. Your team must still set up user roles, approvals, and runtime logs for your systems.
What proof do auditors want alongside our project tickets?
Auditors ask for user role lists, peer approval records, and runtime command logs. They also check that response masking protects emails and card numbers during live queries.