Your CI pipeline should not require therapy. Yet for many teams running workloads on Amazon EKS, wiring Tekton into the mix feels like an emotional support incident waiting to happen. Credentials sprawl, namespaces multiply, and RBAC rules start looking like abstract art. Still, pairing EKS with Tekton is worth it once you get the setup right.
EKS gives you managed Kubernetes with AWS-grade durability. Tekton turns YAML into CI/CD muscle that runs directly on clusters, close to your workloads and secrets. Together they offer a native, cloud-resident pipeline that respects Kubernetes boundaries instead of hiding them under another control plane. The catch is convincing both systems to trust each other without leaking keys all over your logs.
The cleanest EKS Tekton integration revolves around identity, not static credentials. Use Amazon IAM roles mapped through OpenID Connect (OIDC) so Tekton tasks can talk to AWS APIs directly. Each pipeline service account gets an IAM role for service accounts (IRSA) annotation that defines its exact permissions. When a task runs, it exchanges a short-lived web identity token to get the right temporary AWS role. No static keys, no secret rotation calendar. Just workload identity done properly.
Create Tekton pipelines that reference cluster-local images and artifacts stored in ECR. Keep namespace isolation strict: one service account per CI workflow or app domain. Let Kubernetes handle concurrency so you do not need an external orchestrator. Keep logs and metrics in CloudWatch or Prometheus and tag them by pipeline name for quick forensic queries. You want to know instantly who built what, when, and under which IAM role.
Common pitfalls are usually permission-related. If Tekton tasks cannot pull images or push artifacts, check the IRSA mapping first. Ensure your OIDC provider URL in EKS matches the AWS IAM configuration exactly. One character off, and nothing works. Testing with temporary pipelines that just assume a role and query AWS STS keeps the debugging cycle fast.