The first time a Conditional Access Policy failed, it took fifteen minutes to notice and hours to fix. That was fifteen minutes too late.
Quarterly check-ins on Conditional Access Policies are not optional. They are the difference between controlled access and silent exposure. Identity threats move fast. Policy drift is real. Over-permissive rules slip in when nobody is watching. And in cloud-first systems, that slip can go global in seconds.
A quarterly review forces a hard look at every rule: who gets access, from where, under which conditions, and with what controls. It exposes stale policies left behind after role changes. It finds exceptions granted during “temporary” emergencies that never got rolled back. It catches mismatched MFA requirements across environments that attackers love to exploit.
Start with scope. Pull every Conditional Access Policy. Compare them to your security baseline. For each, ask: does this still protect the right resource? Is it binding to the right users and groups? Are the grant controls still strict enough given current threat trends? Then test. Simulate access from risky networks. Check compliance state on devices. Watch for inconsistent behavior between staging and production.