Build with Least Privilege and Separation of Duties

Least privilege and separation of duties stop that from happening. They are not optional. They are the base layers of a secure system. Least privilege limits every user, process, and service to the minimum level of access needed to do its job. Separation of duties divides critical tasks so no single person or system controls the full chain. Together, they close doors attackers look for.

Implementing least privilege starts with strict access controls. Map every role. Remove rights not essential for that role. Automate permission reviews on a set schedule so nothing drifts. Apply these rules to APIs, service accounts, containers, and CI/CD pipelines. Credentials should be scoped narrowly and rotated often.

Separation of duties means breaking up responsibilities that could be abused. No single account should be able to deploy code, approve changes, and move that code to production. Distribute these privileges across independent roles or automated checks. Use version control, signed commits, and enforced merges to make bypassing the process impossible without collusion.

Least privilege reduces the blast radius of any compromise. Separation of duties raises the barrier for insider threats and mistakes. When combined, they are more effective than either alone. Threat surfaces shrink, audit trails sharpen, and compliance becomes easier because control boundaries are clear and provable.

The cost of ignoring these principles is measured in downtime, customer loss, and headlines. The cost to implement is measured in a few hours of design and configuration.

Build with least privilege. Enforce separation of duties. Prove it works. See it live in minutes at hoop.dev.